Hypnerotomachia Poliphili
Introduction
Typography
- Fonts
- Text and image
- Technopaegnia
Woodcuts
Cinematic visual logic
- Moving bodies
- Double page spread
- Filmic sequences
Architecture
Gardens and landscapes
Other editions
Mysterious messages
Eros and metaphor
Technical innovations
External links
Synopsis
Credits
|
|
Synopsis of L. Lefaivres
Leon Battista Albertis
Hypnerotomachia Poliphili
Written by 1467 and printed at the press of the renowned early
Renaissance Venetian publisher, Aldus Manutius, in 1499,
The Hypnerotomachia Poliphili is held among bibliophiles
and book collectors to be the most beautiful book of all time and
for this reason it is one of the most sought-after of all the
incunabulae. It is celebrated as a masterpiece because of its
perfected Bembo typeface, that
went on to become the standard for the next five hundred years,
(pp.10-14) its typographical
design feats in shaping the text to assume rounded, angular
and zigzag contours (pp.135-136), its 172 spectacular woodcuts (pp.14-17), and its integration
of text and images
(pp.17-18). It went through many foreign
language editions.
More than just a beautiful object, the book has attracted the
universal admiration of scholars for its high standards of
scholarship, in particular the philological and archaeological
matters related to architecture.
Indeed, it contains an erudite architectural treatise
(pp.34-43) that is equal if not superior to the other
treatises of the Renaissance, including the most erudite of all,
Leon Battista Albertis De re aedificatoria, as well as one
on Renaissance ars topiaria and garden
design.
The Hypnerotomachia Poliphili is a unique textual
hybrid. In addition to a treatise, it is also a romanzo
damore in the tradition of Giovanni Boccaccio. If
scholars have lavished praise upon the treatise, they have, on
the contrary, dismissed the love story as boring and
derivative. (pp.9-10). Liane Lefaivre argues, however, that
it is much more important than previously believed because of its
unsuspected eroticism. Of course, the eroticism of the
illustrations has been the subject of censorship (pp.66-75).
A closer reading reveals that it is the central device not only
informing the woodcuts and structuring the plot of the story, but
bringing together the seemingly different parts of the book
including the scholarly ones. In fact the erotic is
indissassociable from the erudite and the Hypnerotomachia
Poliphili, as its title suggests, is a kind of polemical
erotic manifesto, applied not only to persons but to a whole way
of life. At a time when chastity is the major building block in
the construction of femininity, one third of the text is taken up
with what is probably the first defense of a woman,
Poliphilos beloved, Polia, to express her sexuality
(pp.62-64) but, of all the erotic themes in the book the most
remarkable is surely that aimed at the metaphor
of the buildings as the embodiment of Polia (pp.64-66).
Why has the eroticizing metaphor of the architectural body
been overlooked? Several reasons, but partly because of its difficult,
polyglot, Joycean prose (pp.87-96) Indeed, it is choked with
Latin and inscription in Greek, and
laced with a smattering of Hebrew, Arabic and many fanciful
hieroglyphics. Adding to the obscurity of the text is the mystery
surrounding its author. So far, attribution have focused on two
Francesco Colonnas, one a Dominican monk living in Venice, the
other a Roman baron (pp.98-109)
Liane Lefaivre attributes the Hypnerotomachia to Leon
Battista Alberti ( p.112-184). The reason the attribution has
not been made before is that architectural historians have tended
in a reductive manner to focus on his purely architectural work
and to disregard Albertis multifaceted, indeed poliphilic
side. She finds traces of Albertis authorship, what Alberti
himself referred to as "sprinklings," in the presence
of the great linguistic and literary sophistication of
the book, of the expertise in geometry and
engineering, of the mechanical inventions,
of the obsession with perspective and the cinematic representation of movement,
and the polemic defense of pacifistic civic humanism. One
reason he would have written this book would have been to
supplement his De re aedificatoria, composed almost twenty years
earlier, before he actually entered the practice of architectural
design first hand. From this point of view, the Hypnerotomachia
is a treatise on architectural creativity and the all
important role of dreamwork in this process (pp.46-57;
168-171).
The one aspect for which there is no precedent in the work of
Alberti is the erotic architectural body. In order to be
understood, it must be seen in a broad context of the history
of the body metaphor in architecture, extending from the
period preceding the early Renaissance to the time then the
Hypnerotomachia was being composed, one where the dominant
mentality of contemptus mundi is being turned upside down, in
favor of a generalized amor mundi and libido aedificandi,
that is when the representations of buildings are reconfigured
from dangerous bodies to marvelous bodies, divine
bodies and, finally, humanist bodies. This process of re-cognition
of the architectural body is crucial to the rise of humanist
architecture and culture. (pp.185-end)

Leon
Battista Alberti's Hypnerotomachia Poliphili
Re-Cognizing the Architectural Body in the Early Italian Renaissance
by Liane Lefaivre
The MIT Press
|